CNN’s “Inside Politics,” host Dana Bash pushed House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries aggressively on the ongoing government shutdown and questioned his party’s role in resolving the impasse.
Bash repeatedly challenged Jeffries’s narrative that Democrats were ready to negotiate, suggesting instead that the real paralysis lay within Democratic leadership’s own demands.
At one point, Bash pressed Jeffries: “You say you want to talk, but Speaker Johnson apparently hasn’t been given permission to meet with you — have you tried knocking on his door, walking down the hall?”
Jeffries responded that Republicans had cut off communication, arguing that informal meetings would not be fruitful without willingness on the part of congressional leadership.
But Bash would not let the exchange end there.
She pressed whether the Democratic proposal — which included extending Affordable Care Act subsidies and reversing GOP healthcare cuts — was negotiable, or whether it was a nonstarter.
Jeffries maintained that Democrats remained open to bipartisan solutions but insisted Republicans had gone “radio silent.”
The tension escalated when Bash framed a question in a blunt, almost confrontational tone: “You could probably take a few steps… have you tried that?”
At several junctures, Bash’s questioning seemed designed to corner Jeffries into accountability, undermining his attempt to shift blame entirely to Republicans.
She also raised the inconsistency of Jeffries’s position, pointing out that what he called “negotiable” may not actually be open to compromise if Democrats hold firm on all their demands.
Jeffries attempted to shift the blame back, saying Republicans had repeatedly tried to repeal the ACA and were unwilling to extend subsidies without structural changes.
Bash followed up by asking whether he would support a one-year extension of those subsidies if Republicans would allow it.
Jeffries demurred, saying he was not ready to accept that narrow fix without broader action.
Through the interview, Bash adopted a skeptical posture toward Jeffries’s narrative — something that conservatives seized on as evidence that even legacy media are now pushing back harder on Democratic talking points.
Conservatives applauded Bash’s refusal to act as a passive conduit for official messaging. One commentator called the moment a turning point in media deference.
Social media users echoed the sentiment: “Even leftist CNN’s Bash shuts down Jeffries’ shutdown whine — caught off guard with brutal challenge.”
The exchange also undercut Jeffries’s argument that Democrats were trying to negotiate in good faith.
Bash sought to expose whether those overtures were real or rhetorical cover.
From a conservative vantage, this marked a welcome line of questioning from mainstream media — one that forces Democratic leaders to defend their posture rather than allowing them to dominate the narrative unchallenged.
The interview ended without a clear breakthrough, but the dynamic was telling: more pressure on Jeffries, less room for him to stick to the standard talking points.
In the coming days, this exchange may be referenced by Republicans as evidence that Democratic leaders aren’t being upfront about what they’re willing or unwilling to give up in negotiations.
Moments before I spoke my wedding vows, my maid of honor revealed a secret that left 300 guests in sh0ck… 
Silence and Shock
The room froze. Whispers of disbelief rustled like dry leaves. My heart pounded, but I remained steady. This was the finale to a symphony of lies—and I was ready to take control.
Facing the Truth
Karen lay on the floor, her bravado shattered, tears streaking her face. Colton gripped my hand, voice cracking. “Anna, I—”“Save it,” I interrupted, firm and unwavering. “You made your choices, and so did I.”
Speaking to Everyone
I turned to the guests and spoke clearly. “I’m sorry for the drama, but honesty matters—even today.”The minister paused. “Anna, what do you want to do?”
Taking Back Control
I inhaled deeply. “This wedding is canceled. But the celebration? That stays.”Gasps softened into murmurs. I smiled. “Let’s eat, drink, and celebrate freedom. Today marks the first day of my new life.”
Walking Toward a New Beginning
I walked away, veil trailing, leaving betrayal behind. Sunlight warmed my face, and I felt lighter. Heartbreak had become strength, and I was ready to write the next chapter on my own terms.
At 98, Dick Van Dyke just proved age is nothing but a number — and politics can still sing. 🇺🇸 The legendary entertainer shocked a roaring crowd when he serenaded Bernie Sanders supporters at a rally, moments after officially endorsing the presidential hopeful. What began as a speech turned into a heartfelt performance that had young and old swaying together — a once-in-a-lifetime scene of music, activism, and pure American history in the making. 
Dick Van Dyke Serenades Crowd at Bernie Sanders Rally After Endorsing the Presidential Hopeful Hollywood legend Dick Van Dyke gave Bernie Sanders supporters in Los Angeles a moment to remember when he broke into song at a campaign rally for the Vermont senator.
The 94-year-old actor took the stage at the LA Convention Center, delighting the crowd with a playful rendition of “We Love You Conrad” from Bye Bye Birdie, reworked into a heartfelt tribute: “We love you, Bernie, yes we do. We love you, Bernie, and we’ll be true. When you’re not near us, we’re blue. Oh Bernie, we love you.”